Skip to main content

Systems for Logistics and Supply Chains

When tracking shipments, coordinating carriers or managing supply chains, email and spreadsheets leave gaps that only show up when something goes wrong.

We build the layer that makes status a property of the system rather than something you reconstruct by phone — designed around partners who send data late, malformed, or not at all.

Your cloudAccounts and repositories

Logistics & Supply Chain Solutions

Comprehensive technology solutions tailored to the unique needs of the logistics & supply chain sector.

Spreadsheet Reliance

Coordination lives in workbooks that one person maintains and everyone else copies from, so the authoritative version of anything is whichever file was opened most recently.

Tracking Systems

An event log per consignment that reconciles identifiers across carriers and sites, so a shipment's history reads as one sequence rather than five partial ones.

Limited Visibility

Answering where a shipment is means calling someone, because status arrives as email and phone updates that were never written anywhere a second person could read.

Workflow Automation

Rules that advance status from received data, chase the partners who have not sent it, and escalate on elapsed time rather than on someone remembering to check.

Workflow Bottlenecks

Exceptions are found rather than raised — a delayed leg or a missing customs document surfaces when a customer asks, by which point the recovery options have narrowed.

Operational Portals

Partner and customer views over the same event log, so a carrier updates status directly and a customer checks it without generating a phone call.

Logistics & Supply Chain Challenges Solved

Logistics work is coordination between organisations that do not share a system, and most of the friction lives at those boundaries. Some of the boundaries are regulatory and have fixed shapes. Importer Security Filing requires specified cargo data to be transmitted to US Customs in advance of vessel loading (19 CFR Part 149), which makes an accurate, timely data handoff a compliance event rather than an operational nicety. The WCO SAFE Framework sets out the advance-electronic-information and authorised-operator principles most national customs regimes now build on, which is why the same data keeps having to be produced in slightly different forms for different authorities. The rest of the boundaries are commercial and have no fixed shape at all: one carrier sends a structured feed, another a daily CSV, a third replies to emails. A system that assumes clean input will be wrong within a week. So the design problem is absorbing inconsistency rather than eliminating it. That means an ingestion layer that accepts late and malformed data without corrupting downstream state, an event model where identifiers reconcile across partners, and exceptions that surface on their own instead of being noticed when a customer calls. GS1's EPCIS standard is worth knowing about here: it exists precisely to describe what happened to an object, where and when, in a form multiple parties can exchange.

Key Logistics & Supply Chain Use Cases

Practical applications of our technology in the logistics & supply chain sector

Consignment event logs reconciled across carriers
Exception detection on elapsed time and missing milestones
Carrier and partner status portals
Ingestion for late, malformed and non-API partner feeds
Advance cargo data capture for customs filings
Multi-site operations dashboards
Automated chase workflows for outstanding partner updates

Services behind this work

The capabilities we draw on for logistics & supply chain engagements

Who this is for

Operations and supply-chain leads who can answer where a shipment is only by calling someone — typically where growth has added partners, sites or carriers faster than the systems connecting them. It fits best where a TMS or WMS already exists and the gaps are between it and everything else. It fits poorly as a replacement for either: the recurring problem is rarely the system of record itself, and a replacement programme is a much larger commitment than the friction usually justifies.

How we work

Discovery maps the handoffs between systems and the points where status is currently re-keyed or asked for, and produces a written architecture review, estimate and delivery plan you own regardless of whether the work continues. Build then runs in increments against the highest-friction handoff first, with code in your repositories and monitoring under your accounts, so the first improvement is in use before the second is scoped. Rollout across multiple sites starts with one site in production, long enough to find what the process documentation left out — that is consistently cheaper than discovering it at five sites simultaneously.

Expected Outcomes

Status visible in one place rather than reconstructed across email, spreadsheets and phone calls. Exceptions that surface on their own instead of being noticed late. Handoffs between systems that stop depending on manual re-entry, which removes both the delay and the transcription errors nobody was counting. Customs and partner data that can be produced on demand because it was captured as it arrived, rather than assembled when it was asked for.

Logistics & Supply Chain Tech FAQs

Can you integrate carrier and partner systems that have no modern API?

Often, though the method varies: scheduled file exchange, EDI, portal-level integration or a queue that absorbs the inconsistency. What we avoid is pretending an unreliable feed is reliable — the design has to account for partners who send data late or malformed, because they will, and a system that only works on clean input is a system that works for about a week.

Do we need to replace our existing TMS or WMS?

Usually not. The recurring problem is rarely the system of record itself but the gaps between it and everything else, which is where dashboards, orchestration and automation do more for less than a replacement programme. Discovery should tell you which of the two you are actually facing before you commit budget to either.

How do you handle a rollout across multiple sites?

One site first, in production, long enough to find what the process documentation left out. Every multi-site rollout we have seen go badly went badly because site two through five turned out to work differently from site one in ways nobody had written down. Rolling out to the rest is a much safer exercise once a real site has used it.

Can the system produce customs and regulatory filings?

It can hold and produce the data those filings need, which is usually the actual bottleneck. Importer Security Filing under 19 CFR Part 149, for instance, requires specified cargo data in advance of loading — the difficulty is rarely the submission itself but assembling accurate data from several partners in time. Whether we submit directly or hand a validated dataset to your broker is a scoping decision.

What happens when a partner sends bad data?

It gets quarantined rather than applied, and raised as an exception with the original payload attached. The failure mode worth designing against is a malformed update silently corrupting a consignment's state, because that is discovered days later by a customer rather than immediately by the system.

Do you use a standard event model or build a bespoke one?

We start from GS1's EPCIS model where partners already speak it, because an interchange standard that describes what happened to an object, where and when, saves inventing one badly. Where partners do not, we map their formats onto an internal event model with the same shape, so adopting the standard later is a translation rather than a rebuild.

Explore Logistics Solutions

Let's automate your tracking and reporting.

Get Started